(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


brought to you by Kollel Iyun Hadaf of Har Nof
Rosh Kollel: Rav Mordecai Kornfeld

Ask A Question about the Daf

Previous daf

Avodah Zarah, 19


OPINIONS: Rebbi states that a person learns Torah only from a place ("mi'Makom") from which his heart desires to learn. He derives this from the verse, "His desire is in the Torah of Hashem" (Tehilim 1:2). In the Gemara later, we find that Rava makes an almost identical statement, "A person should always (l'Olam) learn Torah in a place (b'Makom) that his heart desires." He derives this from the same verse as Rebbi derives his statement.

Presumably, Rava was not merely restating Rebbi's teaching. He seems to be adding something by the slightly different phraseology of his statement. What is the meaning of these two statements?

(a) The MAHARSHA explains that Rebbi is referring to the topic that one learns. One will learn well only when he learns a topic that he wants to learn, and not when he learns something that he has no desire to learn (see BI'UR HALACHAH, OC 553, regarding the Halachah that limits what one is permitted to learn on Tisha b'Av). RASHI (DH mi'Makom) explains that the fact that he wants to learn something else causes him to be unable to concentrate on other material. In contrast, Rava is discussing the *location* in which one learns, referring to his teacher. Rava is saying that one can only learn from a Rebbi from whom he wants to learn. This is why Rava says "b'Makom," "*in* a place" where one's heart desires to learn.

(b) The SEDER YAKOV gives a different explanation. Rebbi is referring to one who learns from a teacher (see Rashi), and he states that a person cannot be forced by another person to learn something that he does not want to learn. Rebbi's statement, though, does not address another situation. When a person knows that he wants to learn one subject, but he thinks that he will benefit more if he learns a different subject (even though his desire to learn that subject is less), what should he learn? Is Rebbi saying that a person cannot be forced by another person to learn something, or is he saying that one is only able to learn when he truly wants to learn? Rava's statement addresses this question. Rava says that even when the person is experiencing an internal conflict about what to learn, he should learn only what he truly wants to learn. This difference between the statement of Rebbi and the statement of Rava is implied in their wording. Rebbi says that "a person does not learn," implying learning from a teacher. Rava states, "A person should always learn...," implying learning where one's heart desires even when the other option is coming from the person himself.

(c) The Seder Yakov cites another explanation of Rava's statement based on the words of the SHEVET MUSAR (Perek 1, DH v'Im Amor Yomar). The Shevet Musar learns that the verse in Tehilim is teaching that a person should always pursue the field of Torah study that he prefers. He supports this assertion with the words of the ARIZAL in the SEFER DERUSHEI HA'NESHAMOS V'HA'GILGULIM (Perek 3). The Arizal explains that a person who completed his learning in a prior lifetime only needs, in his present lifetime, to work on the method of learning that he did not yet master. If someone feels that his heart is drawn only to Gemara, this is because that area of Torah is the area which he needs to master. (Obviously, a person must do all of the Mitzvos, and blatantly neglecting to learn any of the Halachos for this reason is inexcusable. The words of the Arizal refer to the rest of a person's learning, when he is certain that he is not neglecting to learn basic Halachah; see SHACH YD 246:5.) He warns not to heed the scorn of others who tell him to learn other things, as this will only lead him to have to come back to this world in yet another Gilgul.

The words of the Arizal seems to be at odds with the conclusion of the SHULCHAN ARUCH HA'RAV (Hilchos Talmud Torah 1:4), who says in the name of the CHOCHMEI HA'EMES (the scholars of Kabalah) that every Neshamah needs to learn all four levels of Torah learning -- Peshat, Remez, Derush, and Sod -- in order to achieve its Tikun, its perfection. According to the Arizal, though, one needs only to learn the area to which he feels drawn.

The Seder Yakov answers that the two are not arguing. Rather, they are referring to two different types of people. The Arizal is referring to a person who feels that he must learn a certain area of Torah. That person should indeed concentrate on that area. The Shulchan Aruch ha'Rav is referring to a person who feels no particular urge to learn a certain area of Torah, but who just wants to learn. His Neshamah's Tikun is achieved only by learning all areas of Torah. (Y. Montrose)


OPINIONS: Rebbi Tanchum bar Chanila'i says that, "A person should always divide his years into three parts (Yeshalesh) -- a third in Mikra, a third in Mishnah, and a third in Talmud." The Gemara asks does a person know how long he will live, such that he knows exactly how much of his life is a third? The Gemara answers that Rebbi Tanchum is referring to the individual days of a person's life.

How is this division of time supposed to be executed?

(a) RASHI (DH b'Yomi) comments that Rebbi Tanchum means that one should learn Mikra for two days, Mishnah for the next two days, and then learn Gemara for two days, every week. This also seems to be the opinion of the Ran. According to Rashi, what should one learn on Shabbos?
1. The RI MI'LUNIL says, like Rashi, that one's week should be divided into three sets of two days. On Shabbos, one should review everything that he learned during the week.

2. Alternatively, we can suggest that Rashi's opinion is the opinion expressed by RAV YAKOV EMDEN in SIDUR YA'AVETZ (Musach ha'Shabbos 183b), who writes that one should not learn in great depth on Shabbos, since one's learning on Shabbos also must be an Oneg, pleasurable. According to this, Rebbi Tanchum might have given a schedule only for the six days of the week, and not for Shabbos.

TOSFOS (DH Yeshalesh) challenges Rashi's explanation. According to Rashi, the Gemara's original question still applies: a person does not know how long he will live, and thus he might die before the end of the week, not having divided his learning into thirds! (See RITVA here and MAHARIT in Kidushin 30a, who imply that according to Rashi's explanation, we are not concerned about the final week of a person's life.)

(b) TOSFOS explains that a person should learn all three areas of Torah each day. This is why the Chachamim included in daily prayers the recitation of Parshas ha'Tamid (verses of Mikra), the chapter of Eizehu Mekoman (Mishnayos), and the Beraisa of Rebbi Yishmael (Talmud). RABEINU TAM states that those who study Talmud Bavli also achieve this three-way division, for the Gemara in Sanhedrin (24a) tells us that Talmud Bavli is named appropriately, because it is "mixed" ("Belulah") with Mikra, Mishnah, and Talmud.

According to Tosfos, it is apparent that "Yeshalesh" does not mean that one should divide his time into thirds, because if that is what it means, then it saying a few passages of Mikra, Mishnah, and Gemara each day in the daily prayers would not fulfill this obligation, nor would saying a few verses and Mishnayos while learning the Gemara be an equal division of time. "Yeshalesh" obviously means, according to Tosfos, that a person should incorporate some of each of these areas of Torah into his day. This is also the view of the RITVA.

It is important to note that this Gemara does not contradict the Mishnah in Avos (5:21) which says, "Five years old [is the age] for Mikra, ten years old for Mishnah... fifteen years old for Gemara." The MAHARSHA explains that Tosfos' explanation of the Gemara is consistent with the Mishnah there. Even though the Mishnah seems to be saying that one should learn only Talmud after he reaches the age of fifteen, according to the explanation of Tosfos, our Gemara is also saying that one should focus primarily on Gemara as an adult, while merely incorporating some Mikra and Mishnah into his day.

The SEDER YAKOV explains the Mishnah there differently. He says that the Mishnah is referring to the ages at which one becomes ready to learn each subjects. The requirement of "Yeshalesh" applies only after a person is able to learn all of these subjects.

(c) However, the RAMBAM (Hilchos Talmud Torah 1:12) writes that "Yeshalesh" means that a person should study each topic for three hours each day. The Rambam adds that this applies, though, only when a person is first starting to learn. When he becomes greater in knowledge, he may devote only small amounts of time to Mikra and Mishnah, while devoting most of his time to Gemara.

The KESEF MISHNEH learns that the Rambam understands that it is obvious that learning Gemara requires more time than Mikra and Mishnah, and he codifies the Rambam's opinion as the Halachah in SHULCHAN ARUCH (YD 246:4). The LECHEM MISHNEH seems to learn that the Rambam is explaining why the practice of focusing on Gemara is acceptable, similar to the comment of Rabeinu Tam in Tosfos.

The SHACH (246:5) adds an important addendum to this subject. He says that the Gemara is referring to people who have the ability to learn Torah for many hours each day. For people who have only three or four hours a day to learn, they must also incorporate the study of *Halachah* into their schedule. He comments that when the Gemara (Megilah 28b) teaches that "one who learns Halachos each day is assured that he is a Ben Olam ha'Ba," this refers to learning practical Halachos, and not to learning Gemaras about Halachic situations which leave the practical Halachah in doubt. (Y. Montrose)

Next daf


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,