REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous dafBeitzah 40
BEITZAH 36-40 (Siyum!) - Ari Kornfeld has generously sponsored the Dafyomi
publications for these Dafim, for the benefit of Klal Yisrael.
(a) According to Rav, fruit that is given to someone to look after, follows
the Techum of the trustee.
What does Shmuel say?
(b) According to the Rabbanan in a Mishnah in Bava Kama, if Reuven
authorizes Shimon to bring his belongings into his Chatzer, he automatically
takes full responsibility for any damages that they sustain.
(c) Rav rules like the Rabbanan; Shmuel rules like Rebbi.
How do we
attempt to connect their opinions here with their opinions there?
(d) We reject that contention however.
On what grounds would it be
possible for ...
- ... Rav to say that the fruit follows the Techum of the trustee, even according to Rebbi?
- ... Shmuel to say that the fruit follows the Techum of the depositor, even according to the Rabbanan?
(a) How will Rav explain the Reisha of our Mishnah, which permits the
trustees who are looking after the fruit of a man who lives in another town
to bring it to him, provided he made an Eiruv?
(b) We answer the Seifa of our Mishnah, which permits the visiting guests to
take food back with them, provided, before Shabbos, the owner placed it in
their domain through a third person, in two ways; the first, like we
explained the Reisha (in a.).
What is the alternative way of explaining
(a) What is the significance of the meat that was hung on the bolt of the
door where Rav Chana bar Chanila'i? Where did the meat come from?
(b) What was Rav Chana bar Chanila'i doing there?
(c) What did Rav Huna reply when Rav Chana asked him whether he was
permitted to take the meat back with him to his home-town?
(a) Why does the fact that Rav Huna was a disciple of Rav create a problem?
(b) What does the Gemara mean when it answers that 'Ibra de'Dasha' is
(c) We still have a problem or two with the other half of Rav Huna's
statement (that if others hung up the meat on Rav Chana's behalf, he would
be forbidden to take it with him).
What Kashya does ...
- ... Rav Hillel ask Rav Ashi from the Din of Shor shel Petem?
- ... Ravina ask Rav Ashi from Rebbi Dosa (like whom Rebbi Yochanan ruled on Daf 37b)?
- ... Rav Ashi himself ask Rav Kahana from the Mishnah of 'ha'Beheimah ve'ha'Keilim ke'Raglei ha'Ba'alim'?
(a) We conclude that Rav Chana bar Chanila'i was a great man who was deeply
involved in his Torah-study. The issue no longer concerned carrying the meat
back to his home-town, which Rav Huna would clearly have permitted in all
What then is the issue?
(b) In that case, what difference does it make whether it was *he* who hung
up the meat or someone else?
(a) Our Mishnah forbids watering and Shechting the Midbari'os, but permits
watering and Shechting the Baysos.
How does the Tana of our Mishnah
(b) Why does the Tana include watering in his statement?
- ... Midbari'os?
- ... Baysos?
(c) How does the Tana of the Beraisa describe Midbari'os and Baysos?
(d) According to Rebbi, both of these are considered Baysos.
Then what are
(a) Rebbi Shimon bar Rebbi asked his father about 'Patzilei Temarah.
Answers to questions
are Patzilei Temarah?
(b) What did Rebbi reply?
(c) What are the two conditions of 'G'rogros and Tzimukim'?
(a) To answer the apparent discrepancy between Rebbi in the Beraisa, where
he does *not* appear to hold of Muktzah, and Rebbi in our Mishnah, where he
apparently he *does*, we answer initially that the Midbari'os in our Mishnah
are comparable to G'rogros and Tzimukim. In the second answer, we assume
that Rebbi really holds like he says in the Mishnah.
***** Hadran Alach Mashilin Peiros, u'Selika Maseches Beitzah *****
Then how will we
explain his opinion in the Beraisa?
(b) In the third answer, he really holds like Rebbi Shimon (like he says in
How will we then explain his words in the Mishnah?
Answers to questions
On to Rosh Hashanah