REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous dafEruvin 69
(a) According to Rebbi Meir, as long as the other residents of the Mavoy use
the Mavoy before the one who was Mevatel Reshus does, he can no longer
How does Rav Yosef reconcile this with our Mishnah on Amud Beis,
where Rebbi Meir himself forbids them (in that very case - see Tosfos DH
'Lemeimra') to use the Mavoy, once he has carried his things there?
(b) How does Abaye explain the Mishnah on Amud Beis?
(c) The Beraisa, which differentiates between Hichziku and Lo Hichziku,
bears out Abaye. Why can the Beraisa which differentiates between Hichziku
and Lo Hichziku only go like Rebbi Meir, and not like Rebbi Yehudah in our
(d) Why on the other hand, could it go like Rebbi Yehudah in the Beraisa (at
the end of the previous Amud)?
(a) There is a major discrepancy between Rebbi Yehudah in the Beraisa, where
he learns that, once Shabbos comes in, the Tzedoki will forbid the other
residents from carrying, and Rebbi Yehudah in our Mishnah, who learns that
he only forbids them to carry once he carries into the Chatzer.
On what grounds did Rebbi Yehudah Nesi'a declare that the Mumar who carried
a Chumresa de'Medusha (a bag of spices) into the street on Shabbos, eligible
to be Mevatel Reshus?
What is the
basic difference between the versions of Rebbi Yehudah's opinion?
(b) How does the Gemara, by making a slight textural change in the Mishnah
('Ad she'Lo Yotzi'), reconcile our Mishnah with the Beraisa?
(c) What is the Gemara's second way of resolving this discrepancy?
(d) How does the Gemara amend the Beraisa 'Mumar *ve*'Giluy Panim* Harei Zeh
Eino Mevatel Reshus'? Who is the author?
(a) Rebbi Meir holds that a Jew who is suspect of disregarding one of the
Taryag Mitzvos, is suspected of disregarding all of them.
Answers to questions
What do the
Rabbanan hold in this regard?
(b) Then how do we initially explain Rav Huna, who declares someone who
breaks Shabbos publicly, to be a Mumar?
(c) What is the Gemara's alternative answer?
(a) From the Pasuk in Vayikra "Adam Ki Yikrav *Mikem*", the Beraisa
precludes a Mumar from bringing a sacrifice; from "Min ha'Beheimah" it
includes a Mumar.
How can both Derashos be accomodated?
(b) The Beraisa concludes 'Chutz min ha'Mumar ve'Hamenasech ve'Hamechalel
What minor amendment does the Gemara make to the
(c) What is the point of quoting it in the first place?
(a) When being Mevatel Reshus, which of the following expressions is the
correct one to use: 'Reshusi Kenuyah Lach'; or 'Reshusi Mevuteles Lach'?
(b) Does Bitul Reshus require a Kinyan?
(a) The Mishnah permits *all* the residents of the Chatzer to carry from the
houses of those who made an Eruv into the Chatzer and vice-versa, though to
or from the house of the one who forgot is forbidden to everyone.
exactly is the case?
(b) What will be the Din if it was the other residents of the Chatzer who
were Mevatel their Reshus in the Chatzer to the one who forgot?
(c) And what if they were Mevatel their Reshus to *two* residents who
(a) Rebbi Eliezer above (in Perek Osin Pasin) holds that when someone is
Mevatel his Reshus in the Chatzer, the other residents in the Chatzer are
even permitted to carry from his *house* to the Chatzer.
Why do the
Rabbanan in our Mishnah forbid this?
(b) Why is *he* permitted to carry out from *their* houses?
(c) In that case, for the same reason, why are *they* not permitted to carry
out from *his* house into the Chatzer?
(a) The Mishnah mentions the case of 'Nasnu Lo Reshusan' etc., immediately
after the Reisha, where *he* gave *them* Reshus.
What is the Chidush of the Mishnah's statement 'she'Echad Nosen Reshus,
ve'Notel Reshus, Shenayim Nosnin Reshus ve'Ein Notlin Reshus'?
What does the Gemara try
to prove from here?
(b) On what grounds is this proof rejected?
(c) We learnt that if the residents who made an Eruv were Mevatel Reshus to
two residents who forgot to participate, they are not permitted to carry.
But is that not obvious?
Answers to questions