REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous dafPesachim 95
The Mishnah lists three similarities between Pesach Rishon and Pesach
Sheini, and two distinctions.
What are ...
- ... the two distinctions?
- ... the four similarities?
(a) From the Pasuk in Beha'aloscha "ke'Chol Chukas ha'Pesach Ya'asu Oso", we
include Mitzvos she'be'Gufo in the Pesach Sheini.
What are Mitzvos she'Lo Al Gufo?
What is meant by Mitzvos
(b) And what are the Mitzvos she'Al Gufo - which "Al Matzos u'Merorim
Yochluhu" come to include?
(c) Having learned from "ke'Chol Chukas ha'Pesach Ya'asu Oso" that Mitzvos
she'be'Gufo of the Pesach Sheini are similar to the Pesach Rishon, why do we
need "ve'Etzem Lo Yishberu Bo" to preclude Mitzvos *she'Lo* Al Gufo?
(d) Why would we have treated it as a 'P'rat u'Ch'lal', and not vice versa,
and why do we now not do so?
(a) Isi ben Yehudah precludes Mitzvos she'Lo Al Gufo from the Torah's Lashon
"Oso" (in the Pasuk by Pesach Sheini "ke'Chol Chukas ha'Pesach Ya'asu Oso").
What does he do with "ve'Etzem Lo Yishberu Bo"?
(b) And what do the Rabbanan do with "Oso"?
(c) The Gemara adds 'de'Kamah de'Efshar Le'ahaduri, Mehadrinan'.
(a) The Torah lists six Peratim and one K'lal written by the Pesach Sheini.
What is the K'lal?
(b) Each P'rat *includes* one thing and *excludes* one. The Asei of "Al
Matzos u'Merorim Yochluhu" includes that of "Tz'li-Esh".
Which Asei does
(c) The 'La'v ha'Nitak la'Asei' of "Lo Yash'iru Mimenu Ad Boker" includes
that of "Lo Sotzi Mimenu".
Which 'La'v ha'Nitak la'Asei' does it come to
(d) The 'La'v' (that is not a Nitak la'Asei) of "ve'Etzem Lo Yishberu Bo"
includes "Al Tochlu Mimenu Na".
Which La'v does it come to exclude?
(a) This Tana considers the La'v of "Lo Sotzi" (see 5c.) a 'La'v ha'Nitak
Answers to questions
How is it a 'La'v ha'Nitak la'Asei'?
(b) Is this explanation unanymous?
(c) What make the La'vin of "Lo Yera'eh" and "Lo Yimatzei" 'Nitak la'Asei'?
(d) Why do we *include* the La'v of "Al Tochlu Mimenu Na", and *exclude*
that of "Lo Sishchat Al Chametz Dam Zivchi"? Why not vice-versa?
(a) With regard to singing Hallel whilst eating the Pesach Sheini, what do
we learn from the Pasuk in Yeshayah "ha'Shir Yihye Lachem ke'Leil Hiskadesh
(b) The Navi only precludes Hallel from being said at *night-time*, but not
during the preparation of the Pesach Sheini during the *day*.
reason does the Gemara give for reciting Hallel during the preparation of
(a) We infer from our Mishnah, that although the Pesach Sheini over-rides
Shabbos, it does *not* over-ride Tum'ah.
(b) Rebbi Yehudah maintains that it *does*.
(c) How do we reconcile Rebbi Yehudah, who holds in another Beraisa that
Pesach Sheini does *not require Linah* (in Yerushalayim) - even though it
does over-ride Tum'ah, with the Beraisa which learns that it over-rides
Tum'ah (like Rebbi Yehudah) yet it *requires Linah*?
(d) What does Rebbi Yehudah (in one of the above-mentioned Beraisos) learn
from the juxtaposition of "Sheshes Yamim Tochal Matzos" to "u'Fanisa
va'Boker, ve'Halachta le'Ohalecha" (in Re'ei)?
(a) Why are Zavin and Zavos etc., not included in the Heter of eating a
Pesach ha'Ba b'Tum'ah, together with Teme'ei Mes?
(b) What do we learn from the juxtaposition of "ve'ha'Nefesh Asher Tochal
Basar ve'Tum'aso Alav, ve'Nichresah" to "Kol Tahor Yochal Basar" (in Tzav)?
(c) They *are* however, Chayav for entering the Azarah. How does Rebbi
Eliezer learn from the Pasuk in Naso "vi'Yeshalechu Min ha'Machaneh Kol
Tzaru'a, ve'Chol Zav ve'Chol Tamei la'Nafesh" that they are *not*?
(d) What do the Rabbanan do with this Pasuk?
(a) Rav Yodef asked whether a Tamei Mes who is permitted to enter the Azarah
by a Pesach ha'Ba b'Tum'ah, is Chayav Kareis if he enters the Heichal.
Answers to questions
Kohanim who are Tahor permitted to enter the Heichal?
(b) Why should the Tamei Mes by a Pesach ha'Ba b'Tum'ah be Patur?
(c) How does Rava resolve the Sha'leh from the Pasuk in Naso ...
- ... "vi'Yeshalchu *Min* ha'Machaneh" (according to the first Lashon)?
- ... "vi'Yeshalchu *Min* ha'Machaneh ... mi'Chutz la'Machaneh Teshalechum" (according to the second Lashon)?