|(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)
 Gemara 70b [line 11]:
1) [line 2] M'YDI'AS SHABBOS HU PORESH - when he is informed that it is Shabbos, he refrains from doing the forbidden Melachah
2) [line 8] CHILUK MELACHOS, MENALAN? - from where do learn that Melachos are differentiated (that for each Melachah one must bring a separate Korban)?
3) [line 10] AL CHILUL ECHAD - for the desecration of one Shabbos
5) [line 26] L'HAKISH ELEHA - to derive a law from the proximity of one verse to this verse
KOL DAVAR SHE'HAYAH BI'CHLAL V'YATZAH MIN HA'KLAL LE'LAMED
a) When a new Halachah is explicitly written in the Parshah discussing the object that was singled out(This rule should not be confused with Davar she'Hayah bi'Chlal v'Yatzah li'Don b'Davar he'Chadash, which refers to a case where the new law that is mentioned with regard to the object that was singled out is in *contradiction* to the general rule of the Klal.)
6) [line 30] HAV'ARAH L'LAV YATZAS
7) [line 32] L'CHALEK YATZAS
8) [line 34] "[NEFESH KI SECHETA BI'SHGAGAH MI'KOL MITZVOS HASHEM ASHER LO SE'ASENAH,] V'ASAH ME'ACHAS ME'HENAH" - "If an individual sins inadvertently by violating any of the negative commandments of Hashem,] and he does any one (lit. *from any one*) of these (lit. *from these*)" (Vayikra 4:2)
9) [line 37] ACHAS ME'ACHAS, HENAH ME'HENAH - the Torah could have written "Achas" ("one") but instead wrote "me'Achas" ("from one"). Similarly, the Torah could have written "Henah" ("these") but instead wrote "me'Henah" ("from these"). We can learn certain laws from these additions. We learn that a person is Chayav for transgressing Achas (one Melachah) or me'Achas (part of an intended Melachah), and Henah (the Avos Melachos themselves) or me'Henah (Toldos, which are derived and come from the Avos)
*10*) [line 37] ACHAS SHE'HI HENAH, HENAH SHE'HI ACHAS - That is, the Beraisa finds six teachings in the verse: (a) the word "Achas," (b) the Mem that precedes it, (c) the fact that it is associated in the verse with the word "Henah" (TOSFOS DH Mai) -- and then the same three inferences, but this time from the word "Henah."
11) [line 6] HE'ELEM ZEH VA'ZEH B'YADO - if he forgot that it was Shabbos and also that these Melachos are forbidden
*12*) [line 15] ELA, LO SHENA - Ravina claims that the fact that it is Shabbos is the main reason for not doing Melachos, therefore forgetting Shabbos is primary, and he is only Chayav one Chatas. (TOSFOS DH Amar Lei)
13) [line 27] D'YADA LAH BI'TECHUMIN - he knew that it was Shabbos with regard to the prohibition against walking beyond the Techum
14) [line 28] V'ALIBA D'REBBI AKIVA (TECHUMIN: D'ORAISA) A person is only allowed to travel a distance of two thousand Amos from his city or dwelling place (if he is not in a city) on Shabbos. Rebbi Akiva claims that this Halachah of "Techum Shabbos" is mentioned in the Torah. He compares two verses which specify the outer boundaries of the cities that were given to the Levi'im. One verse (Bamidbar 35:4) states that their cities' Migrashim (the open spaces outside of the cities) extend one thousand Amos from the wall of the city. The next verse (ibid. 35:5) specifies that the boundaries of the cities extend for two thousand Amos from the edges of the city. He explains that the first verse gives the cities' boundaries while the second verse sets the Techum Shabbos.
15) [line 29] KI'GROGERES - grain which is the size of a dry fig