(Permission is granted to print and redistribute this material
as long as this header and the footer at the end are included.)


prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem

Previous daf

Shevuos 9

SHEVUOS 6-10 - Ari Kornfeld has generously sponsored the Dafyomi publications for these Dafim for the benefit of Klal Yisrael.


(a) According to Rebbi Yishmael, who holds that 'Ein Bah Yedi'ah bi'Techilah, ve'Yesh Bah Yedi'ah be'Sof' brings a Korban Olah ve'Yored, what does the Sa'ir ha'Na'aseh ba'Chutz atone for?

(b) But do the Se'irei ha'Regalim and the Se'irei Rosh Chodesh not already atone for that?

(c) In that case, what does he learn from the Hekesh of "Mi'levad Chatas ha'Kipurim"?

(a) What does Rav Yehudah Amar Shmuel learn from the Pasuk in Pinchas (in connection with the Musaf of Rosh Chodesh) "u'Se'ir Izim Echad le'Chatas *la'Hashem*" (to explain Rebbi Yehudah in our Mishnah)?

(b) We query this however, from Resh Lakish, who already uses this Pasuk for another D'rashah? Which D'rashah?

(c) How do we answer this Kashya (based on the Lashon of "la'Hashem")?

(d) Then how can Resh Lakish make an additional D'rashah?

(a) We learn that the Sa'ir Rosh Chodesh does not extend to other sins, from Tana de'Bei Rebbi Yishmael.
What does Tana de'Bei Rebbi Yishmael say? How does he learn this from the Sa'ir ha'Na'aseh ba'Chutz of Yom Kipur (which is mentioned in this Parshah, too)?

(b) Why can we not learn the Se'irei ha'Regalim from ...

  1. ... that of Rosh Chodesh?
  2. ... that of Yom Kipur?
(c) Then how could we learn the Sa'ir of Rosh Chodesh from that of Yom Kipur? What does 'Giluy Milsa' mean?
(a) In fact, we learn the Se'irei ha'Regalim from Rebbi Chama b'Rebbi Chanina.
What does Rebbi Chama b'Rebbi Chanina mean when he says "Sa'ir", "u'Se'ir"?

(b) Seeing as Rosh Chodesh itself is learned from a 'Binyan-Av' from Yom Kipur, how can we then learn the other Yamim-Tovim from it (in view of the principle 'Ein Lemeidin Lamed min ha'Lameid be'Kodshim')?

Answers to questions



(a) We ask whether, when Rebbi Yehudah learns from "la'Hashem", that the Se'irei Rosh Chodesh ... atone for 'she'Ein Bah Yedi'ah Lo bi'Techilah ve'Lo be'Sof', this also applies to cases which stand to become known.
What do we mean by that?

(b) If not, then which Korban will atone for them?

(c) The outcome of the She'eilah is based on a Beraisa.
What does the Beraisa say?

(a) According to Rebbi Shimon, the Se'irei Rosh Chodesh atone for a Tahor person who ate a Tamei Korban. And he learns it from the Pasuk in Shemini "ve'Osah Nasan Lachem Laseis es Avon ha'Eidah".
What is this Pasuk talking about? In which context is it written?

(b) What does Rebbi Shimon then learn from the 'Gezeirah-Shavah' "Avon" "Avon" (from the Pasuk in Tetzaveh [in connection with the Tzitz] "Ve'hayah al Metzach Aharon Ve'nasa Aharon es Avon ha'Kodashim ... ")?

(c) And what does he then learn from the word ...

  1. ... "Avon *ha'Eidah*"?
  2. ... "*ve'Osah* Nasan Lachem"?
(d) What does Rav Ashi learn from the fact that in Shemini, the Torah writes "Avon ha'Eidah", and in Tetzaveh, "Avon ha'Kodashim"? From which letter does he actually learn it?
Answers to questions

Next daf


For further information on
subscriptions, archives and sponsorships,
contact Kollel Iyun Hadaf,