ANSWERS TO REVIEW QUESTIONS
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous dafYoma 39
YOMA 36-40 have anonymously sponsored towards a REFU'AH SHELEMAH to Shmuel
Yakov ben Ayala Hinda, Ilana Golda bas Chana and Klarees Marcia bas Mammie
***** Perek Taraf be'Kalfi *****
(a) 'Taraf be'Kalfi' means that the Kohen Gadol placed his hands in the box
and quickly remove the two lots. This was necessary so that he should not
feel which lot was the one for Hashem and take it in his right hand.
(b) He drew the two wooden (or golden) lots, one in each hand.
(c) If the lot for Hashem came up in his *right* hand - the S'gan would say
to him 'My master the Kohen Gadol, raise your *right*-hand'!
(d) And if it came up in his *left*-hand - the head of the current Beis-Av
would say 'My master the Kohen Gadol, raise your *left*-hand'!
(a) He then placed the two lots on the respective goats' heads, and said ...
(b) The Kohanim who were present, would respond with 'Baruch Shem' etc. (as
one always did upon hearing either a Berachah or the proper name of Hashem).
- ... 'la'Hashem Chatas' - according to the Tana Kama.
- ... 'la'Hashem' - according to Rebbi Yishmael. Note: Hashem throughout, refers to the real Name of Hashem.
(a) The box was made of wood.
(b) It was just large enough to hold the Kohen Gadol's two hands.
(c) They made it Chol without declaring it Kodesh - because K'lei Shares
were not made of wood.
(d) The Torah indicates that one should not cause unnecessary financial
losses to Jewish property - by Tzara'as Batim, when it orders the owner to
clear out the vessels from his house *before* the Kohen declares his house
(and everything inside it), Tamei (to spare earthenware vessels, which are
not subject to Tevilah, from having to be destroyed).
(a) According to Rebbi Yehudah quoting Rebbi Eliezer, the S'gan and the
Kohen Gadol both placed their right-hand in the box and drew one lot each.
(b) If the lot for Hashem came up in the *hand of the S'gan*, it was the
*head of the Beis-Av* who would tell the Kohen Gadol to say 'la'Hashem
Chatas' - because it would embarrass him for the *S'gan* to do so (seeing as
the lot came in the *S'gan's* right hand, and not in his own).
(c) The Tana Kama of our Mishnah holds that the left-hand of the Kohen Gadol
is preferable to the right-hand of the S'gan, whereas Rebbi Yehudah holds
(d) Rebbi Chanina S'gan ha'Kohanim says - that the S'gan only walked on the
Kohen Gadol's right on Yom Kipur in order to take over should the Kohen
Gadol become Tamei (implying that until that happened, he did not
participate in the Avodah at all).
(a) During the forty years that Shimon ha'Tzadik served as Kohen Gadol, the
lot for Hashem *always* came up in the Kohen Gadol's right-hand. It was only
after he died, that it began to come up, sometimes in his *right* hand,
sometimes in his *left*.
(b) Every Yom Kipur during those forty years, the piece of red wool would
turn white, but afterwards, this miracle too, was no longer constant. And
the same happened with the Ner ha'Ma'aravi, which had always burned the
longest during his life-time, and with the fire of the Ma'arachah, which had
always been self-generating.
(c) The significance of the miracle of ...
1. ... the wool on Yom Kipur - was that Hashem had forgiven Yisrael for all
(d) Depending on whether the Menorah was placed from east to west or from
north to south, the Ner Ma'aravi was either the middle lamp (which was lit
pointing westwards) or the second lamp from the east.
2. ... the western lamp - that the Shechinah rested in Yisrael.
(a) After the death of Shimon ha'Tzadik - the blessing that had previously
affected the loaves, was now re-placed with a curse. Previously, every Kohen
received a k'Zayis, some were satisfied and some even left over (after being
satisfied), whereas from now on, each Kohen would only receive the amount as
large as a bean, and was not satisfied (see Agados Maharsha).
(b) After the death of Shimon ha'Tzadik, the modest Kohanim declined to
receive a portion of the above, since it did not satisfy anyway (nor were
they performing a Mitzvah, since it was less than a k'Zayis).
(c) One Kohen took his friend's portion as well as his own - earning
himself the title of 'ben Chamtzan' till the day he died.
(a) Shimon ha'Tzadik knew that he was destined to die the year that he did -
because the 'old man' who used to accompany him into the Kodesh Kodshim and
out again each Yom Kipur wearing white clothes, wore black clothes that Yom
Kipur; neither did he accompany him out again. (See Tosfos Yeshanim.)
(b) He became ill after Sukos and died seven days later.
(c) After he died, the Kohanim stopped using the real Name of Hashem during
Duchening (Note: There are two opinions as to which Name of Hashem is
referred to here, the Name of four letters - pronounced the way that is
forbidden to us, or that of forty-two letters).
(a) Forty years before the destruction of the Beis Hamikdash - the lot for
Hashem no longer came up in the Kohen Gadol's right-hand, the piece of red
wool no longer turned white and the western lamp did not burn longer than
the other lamps.
(b) Raban Yochanan ben Zakai scolded the gates of the Heichal - because they
were opening by themselves, a sign inviting the enemy to enter and to
destroy the Beis Hamikdash.
(c) The Navi Zecharyah ben Ido already hinted at this phenomenon.
(d) The Beis Hamikdash is called ...
- ... "Levanon" - because it whitens (i.e. cleanses) the sins of Yisrael.
- ... "Beis Ya'ar" - because, the golden fruit that Shlomoh Hamelech planted there blossomed and grew, just like a forest (as we learnt earlier on Daf 29b.).
(a) The Kohen Gadol mentioned the full Name of Hashem - during the first
Viduy and second Viduy (both over the bull), during the third Viduy (over
the Sa'ir ha'Mishtale'ach), and when he placed the lot on the head of the
(b) He said the Name of Hashem three times on each of the first three
occasions, and once, on the fourth, making a total of ten times.
(c) According to the Tana in the Beraisa, the opening of the doors of the
Heichal could be heard as far away as eight Techumei Shabbos (i.e. eight
(a) The Ketores caused ...
(b) It had a similar effect on the brides of Yerushalayim (although the
brides of Yericho *did* require perfume - because brides tend to use more
perfume than other women [Tosfos Yeshanim]).
- ... the goats of Yericho - to sneeze.
- ... the women of Yericho - to manage without perfume.
(c) That old man told Rebbi Yehoshua ben Korchah that he once went to Shiloh
(where the Mishkan once stood), and he was still able to smell the aroma of
the Ketores that had been brought then, coming out of the walls.
(a) According to Rebbi Yanai, Hagralah was crucial, whereas placing them on
the heads of the two goats was not.
(b) Rebbi Yochanan holds that neither was crucial.
(c) According to this Lashon, Rebbi Yanai will agree that even Hagralah is
not crucial - according to Rebbi Yehudah, who says that whatever was
performed with the white garments *outside* the Kodesh Kodshim, was not
(d) According to this Lashon, they argue according to Rebbi Nechemyah, who
says that "Chukah" pertained to whatever the Kohen Gadol performed in the
Bigdei Lavan - even if was performed *outside* the Kodesh Kodshim.
Nevertheless, he will agree that Hagralah was not crucial, because Hagralah
was not an Avodah.
(a) According to the second Lashon, which holds that Rebbi Yochanan and
Rebbi Yanai argue according to Rebbi Yehudah - Rebbi Yanai holds that
Hagralah was crucial - even according to Rebbi Yehudah, because the Torah
repeats by Hagralah the words "Asher Alah" (and repetition in the realm of
Kodshim is a sign that it is crucial).
(b) The problem with the Beraisa, which states '*Mitzvah* Lehagril' - is
that, according to the second Lashon, where Rebbi Yanai holds that even
Rebbi Yehudah agrees that Hagralah was crucial, who can be the author
(according to Rebbi Yanai)?
(c) Rebbi Yanai will have to amend the Beraisa to 'Mitzvah *Lehani'ach*'
(but Hagralah is crucial).