REVIEW QUESTIONS ON GEMARA AND RASHI
prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Jerusalem
Previous daf Zevachim 36
ZEVACHIM 36-40 - Dedicated to the leaders and participants in the Dafyomi
shiurim at the Young Israel of New Rochelle, by Andy & Nancy Neff
(a) Bearing in mind that the Torah has already written in Bo (in connection
with the Korban Pesach) "Lo Sosiru Mimenu ad Boker", what does Rebbi Yehudah
learn from the Pasuk in Tzav "Lo Yani'ach Mimenu ad Boker"?
(b) The Torah writes next to it "u'Vesar Zevach *Todas* Shelamav".
we learn from ...
(c) What is a Chalipei Todah?
- ... the juxtaposition of the two Pesukim?
- ... the word "u'Vesar"? Which two aspects of Korban, besides Chalipin does this come to include?
(d) What happens to it?
(a) And what does the Pasuk come to include (in the list of Korbanos that
can be eaten for one day) with the word ...
(b) And which three types of loaves does "Korbano" incorporate?
- ... "Zevach"? Which two Korbanos does this include?
- ... "Shelamav"? Which two Korbanos does that include?
(c) If "Lo Yani'ach" comes to teach us the time limit of all the above, how
can Rebbi Yehudah learn 'Machsheves Hinu'ach from it?
(a) What problem do we have with the current source of Rebbi Yehudah ("Lo
Yani'ach"), from our Mishnah Shachtan al-M'nas ... O Le'hotzi'an la'Chutz"?
(b) In addition, what reason did Rebbi Yehudah himself give to explain why
Machsheves Hinu'ach is Pasul?
(c) At which stage does Hinu'ach render the Korban. Pasul?
(d) If Rebbi Yehudah's reason is based on a S'vara, what problem do we have
with his opinion?
(a) What general answer do we give to explain why Rebbi Yehudah does not
argue by all the cases in our Mishnah?
(b) How do we know that the Tana is speaking about the Teme'im bringing the
*Eimurin*' and not the *blood*?
(c) What do we mean when we say in the second Lashon 'Kol ke'Mineih'?
(d) And why does he not then argue with the Tana Kama by ...
- ... 'Le'areiv Damo be'Dam Pesulim'?
- ... 'Litein es ha'Nitnin le'Ma'alah, le'Matah' or vice-versa?
(a) We say that Rebbi Yehudah does not argue with the Tana Kama over
'ha'Nitnim bi'Fenim she'Nasnan ba'Chutz' and vice-versa, because it is not a
place that is 'Meshulash'.
What does 'Meshulash' mean?
(b) To which case does this refer?
(c) We query Rebbi Yehudah however, from another Beraisa.
What does Rebbi
Yehudah learn from the Pasuk "Lo Sizbach ... Kol Davar Ra", besides the
P'sul of a Chatas which is Shechted in the south?
(d) What problem does this create with what we just said?
(a) What does Rebbi Yehudah mean when he says in a Mishnah in 'Kol
ha'Zevachim', 'Hichnis be'Shogeg Kasher'?
Answers to questions
(b) We infer from there 'Ha be'Meizid Pasul'.
How do we establish the
case? At which stage is the Korban Pasul?
(c) What 'Kal va'Chomer' do we Darshen from there, that clashes with what we
(d) How do we then resolve the discrepancy in Rebbi Yehudah?
(a) We also query Rebbi Yehudah with regard to his previous D'rashah from
"Kol Davar Ra", that one is Chayav for Shechting a Chatas on the south side
of the Azarah.
How does he Darshen the same phrase "Kol Davar Ra", in
(b) And how do we resolve this discrepancy?
(a) What does Rava mean when he says 'u'Modeh Rebbi Yehudah, she'Chozer
(b) Rava tries to prove this from 'Pigul Lifnei Zerikah'.
What is he
(c) How does apply the same S'vara to Rebbi Aba's ruling?
(d) How do we refute Rava's proof?
(a) Rav Huna queries Rava (strange, since Rav Huna lived long before Rava)
from the Beraisa that we discussed earlier.
What does the Tana rule there
in a case where ...
(b) And what does the Tana say about the Korban, in a case where, following
a Machsheves Hinu'ach, but on the next day (according to Rebbi Yehudah), the
Kohen subsequently had a Machsheves Chutz li'Mekomo or Chutz li'Zemano?
- ... the one who Shechted the Korban had in mind to place the blood of a Korban that is normally placed above the Chut ha'Sikra, below it or vice-versa?
- ... by one of the subsequent Avodos, the Kohen had a Machsheves Chutz li'Mekomo or ...
- ... Chutz li'Zemano?
(c) What does this prove?
(a) What does Rav Chisda Amar Ravina bar Sala say about someone who has a
Machshavah that Teme'im should eat the Korban Chatas tomorrow?
(b) What is the Chidush?
(c) On what grounds do we refute Rava's proof from every case of Pigul,
where the Shochet or the Kohen's thoughts occur before Zerikah, when the
Korban is also not yet fit to eat?
(a) Rav Chisda speaks about the Basar of the Korban Pesach or the Chalos
Todah that one ate before they were ready to be eaten.
What does this
(b) What did Rav Dimi bar Chin'na used to say in this regard?
(c) What is the Chidush?
(a) The Beraisa comments on the Pasuk in Tzav "ve'ha'Nefesh Asher Tochal
mi'Besar Zevach Shelamim Asher la'Hashem".
***** Hadran Alach 'Kol ha'Pesulin' *****
What does the Tana learn from
(b) What does Rava try to prove from there?
(c) We refute the proof in one of two ways. One of them, in that Eimurin are
at least fit for Hashem, whereas the Pesach and the Lachmei Todah are not.
what is the alternative refutation?
***** Perek Beis Shamai *****
(a) Most Korbanos whose blood is sprinkled on the Mizbe'ach ha'Chitzon,
require two Matanos on the two diagonally opposite corners (that have a
What will be the Din if the Kohen performed only one?
(b) Beis Shamai and Beis Hillel agree on this. They argue however, by a
How many Matanos does a Chatas require?
(c) What is then Beis Shamai and Beis Hillel's bone of contention?
(d) According to Beis Hillel, what will be the Din therefore, if the Kohen
places the first Matanah ...
- ... correctly, and the second Matanah with a Machsheves Chutz li'Zemanah?
- ... with a Machsheves Chutz li'Zemanah, and the second with a Machsheves Chutz li'Mekomah?
(a) What is the basic difference between the Matanos of the Mizbe'ach
ha'Chitzon (which we just discussed) and those of the Mizbe'ach ha'Penimi?
Answers to questions
(b) What will be the Din if the Kohen placed any one of the Matanos on the
Mizbe'ach ha'Penimi with a Machsheves she'Lo bi'Zemano?
(c) Why is it not Pigul?